:3 heyo. I'm Gel. I don't know what to put here. I like to draw animals, particularly canines. I will do trades, commissions, and occassionally requests.
Oh. my other gallery is gel-chan.deviantart.com. That'll be used more for trades and the like, while I plan to use this for more personal arts less this is the only place I know you from, then I'll post the trade here.
OBABY. Got my layout working I'm so cool. NOT ROFL. -so hyper-
OH. I started an INTERWEB WAR : ) was funny.
ON THE SUBJECT OF SONY, NINTENDO, NAD MOTION SENSORS:
Gel: um. Sony had stuff with motion sensors before o_o; just sayin, like they had an eyetoy for stuff like that. besides, all the systems compete with each other. they /have/ to. it's a buisness.
Person: 1) the eye toy was entirely different and original
and
2) i don't see nintendo copying it!!
siriously the eyeoty was inovative and brought customers but nintendo, being an honorable company, didn't steal it just to earn a buck. SONY IS A LOW-DOWN CHEATING SON OF A B____!!!
Gel: um. the idea of using the idea of a camera for a game sort of is, but an eyes toy is in essence a webcam. x: not really original.
nintendo is a completly different system type. playstation is more like a computer, where nintendo systems, from my limited understanding, are /just/ game systems. none of nintendo's systems have been for anything but games in the traditional sense. putting the camera in the controler is just using sony's idea in a different way, so you don't need to buy 2 things x: just my opinion tho.
Person: THERE IS NO CAMERA!!
the motion-sencing device in not a camera!!
it is something else completely, which sony stole from nintendo's Wii.:stupid: <- emote with a sign saying "You're stupid!" on it : ) REEAAAAL MATURE.
Gel: Oh. sorry. but I'm no electronics expert, anyway x:
JEEEZ. I state my point, in some elses JOURNAL COMMENTS, no less. and I get sworn at. SO AWSOME HUH?